You are here:

Probate

Summary

Probate cases initiated and finalised for the period 01/07/2016 to 30/06/2017 have increased by 2% when compared to previous year. Pending cases have also increased by 1% when compared to 2015/2016. This has placed the clearance rate at 100% for 2016/2017.

Outcome Measures

Clearance rates

The clearance rate, expressed as a percentage, compares the number of cases that have been finalised with the number of cases that have been initiated. The clearance rate is an indicator of efficiency, which measures how well the Court uses its resources to manage its caseload. The internationally accepted target applied by courts is 100% (the number of cases cleared equals the number of cases filed), which aims to ensure there is no increase in the backlog of cases. 

Benchmark 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017
100% 100% 100% 100%


Case backlog 

Case backlog data provides a quantitative measure of a court's timely case processing performance, enabling the court to focus its attention on what is required to ensure cases are brought to completion within reasonable timeframes.

Year More than 12 mths More than 24 mths
Benchmark 20% 5%
2014 / 2015 5% 16%
2015 / 2016 6% 17%
2016 / 2017 4% 2%


On-time case processing 

This measure, in conjunction with Clearance Rates and Case Backlog, is a fundamental management tool to assess the timeliness and efficiency of a court in resolving cases.

Year Within 12 mths Within 12 mths to 24 mths More than 24 mths Benchmark less than12 mths Benchmark less than 24 mths
2014 / 2015 100% 0% 0% 75% 90%
2015 / 2016 100% 0% 0% 75% 90%
2016 / 2017 99% 1% 0% 75% 90%



Court File Integrity 

The Court File Integrity measure equates to the percentage of case files that meet established standards of availability, accuracy and completeness; as determined through a process of random audits. The measure is used to demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of daily court operations and the fairness of judicial proceedings.

Output Measures

Cases initiated

Measuring the number of new cases that are initiated informs the Court of the volume of its workload received during the year. This is used to monitor the efficiency of administrative operations.

Year Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total
2014 / 2015 5103 5581 4591 4921 20196
2015 / 2016 5377 5442 5112 5524 21455
2016 / 2017 5664 5596 5058 5277 21595


Cases finalised

Measuring the number of cases that have been finalised informs the Court of the volume of its workload cleared during the year. This is used to monitor the efficiency of administrative operations.

Year Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total
2014 / 2015 5050 5740 4506 4898 20194
2015 / 2016 5317 5393 4958 5751 21419
2016 / 2017 5486 5798 4789 5490 21563


Cases pending 

The table below provides a quantitative assessment of the Court's timeliness in processing cases. 

Year Overall Within 12 mths to 24 mths More than 24 mths
2014 / 2015 1049 833 168
2015 / 2016 1120 863 185
2016 / 2017 982 922 17

 

Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook Watch us on Youtube